ait CLI and local trust layer
Release-facing posture: Apache-2.0. This is the inspectable local
trust layer for plans, tasks, snapshots, and local workflow state.
Release License Summary
This page summarizes the current release-facing posture for the main ait
surfaces. It follows the repository's legal drafts and release guidance, and
it is explicit about where rights are permissive, reciprocal, commercial,
or still intentionally bounded.
ait CLI and local trust layer
Release-facing posture: Apache-2.0. This is the inspectable local
trust layer for plans, tasks, snapshots, and local workflow state.
aitk and ait-agent
Release-facing posture: Apache-2.0. The local read-only companion and
baseline transport/runtime layer stay in the permissive public surface.
ait-server and ait-worker
Release-facing posture: AGPL-3.0-only OR LicenseRef-AIT-Commercial.
Shared control-plane software is not treated as part of the permissive
local trust layer.
ait-web
Release-facing posture: LicenseRef-AIT-Commercial by default. The
main authenticated browser workflow surface is not currently described
as a blanket public Apache grant.
site/** does not carry a blanket public software-license grant by
default. Release-facing website copy may later receive a more explicit
documentation/content grant when deliberately published as such.
Brand assets are governed by trademark boundaries, not by source-code licenses alone. Software or content access does not automatically grant rights in the marks.
LICENSE is intentionally narrow; do not read it as a whole-repository Apache grant.https://ait-native.dev, but domain control does not replace trademark policy or clearance work.The project is still careful about separating public local trust-layer software, reciprocal shared-control-plane software, commercial browser/admin surfaces, and official brand assets. This summary exists to make those boundaries legible instead of letting the repository layout imply more than has actually been granted.
This is a release-facing summary, not a final commercial agreement and not legal advice. Counsel-reviewed license instruments, notices, and trademark policy may refine these boundaries later without changing the current honesty rule: explicit grants should stay explicit.